Buy the Nike Air Monarch IV.

It costs three times more and still ends up the cheaper shoe to own.

What was compared

Mens Running Shoes Tennis Sneakers Slip On Walking Shoe Blue Size 6.5 | Breathable丨Lightwe... — $19.99
Nike Men's NIKE AIR MONARCH IV (4E) RUNNING SHOES -10.5; White / Metallic Silver-Midnight ... — $59.89

1. Lasts years, not just one
A reviewer of the no-name shoe reported the sole coming apart after about a year of regular use. The Monarch IV's leather and Air-Sole build is widely known to survive years of daily wear. Pay once and keep wearing it, not twice.
2. Real cushioning under every step
The Monarch IV runs Nike Air cushioning the full length of the shoe for actual shock absorption. Buyers of the cheaper pick said outright they wanted more cushioning, because plain EVA foam just cannot do what an air unit does.
3. Thirty thousand buyers agree, not fifteen hundred
The Monarch IV holds a 4.4 star average across 31,569 ratings. The no-name shoe sits at 4.1 across 1,523. That sample size proves the comfort and durability hold up across real feet, not just a lucky handful of boxes.
4. Built for one job, not five taglines
The cheap pair markets itself as running, tennis, walking, gym and casual all at once, but reviewers note running and tennis shoes need different stability and cushioning entirely. The Monarch IV is proven specifically for training and daily wear, so it delivers the support it promises.
5. Yes it costs three times more. Still worth it.
19.99 against 59.89 is a real gap up front, no denying it. But with the cheaper sole reportedly separating within a year and the Monarch built to run for years, the Nike ends up cheaper per year worn, not more expensive.