Buy the Logitech G305 Lightspeed.
It is the cheapest of the three and the only one owners say still works years later.
What was compared
- Logitech G305 Lightspeed Wireless Gaming Mouse - Black | 12,000 DPI, Lightweight, 6 Progra... — $29.99
- Razer Basilisk V3 X HyperSpeed Customizable Wireless Gaming Mouse, Black | Mechanical Swit... — $48.99
- Redragon M602 Griffin RGB Gaming Mouse, Tri-Mode 2.4G/USB-C/Bluetooth Mouse Gaming, RGB Sp... — $28.59
Five reasons
1. Proven to last years, not months
Multiple owners report G305 units going strong after 4 to 7 years, while Basilisk V3 X buyers report failures within 2 months and Redragon owners flag frequent sensor spinouts. For a mouse you touch every day, that real-world durability gap matters more than any spec sheet.
2. Less fatigue on long sessions
The G305 weighs 89g against the Basilisk V3 X's 107g, about 10 percent lighter, and that shows up every time you flick across the pad for hours. Unless you want the bulkier feel of a filled-in ergonomic shell, the lighter body wins for everyday gaming.
3. Tracks clean where others skip and stutter
Reviewers say the G305's HERO sensor performs like Logitech's pricier G Pro Wireless, while Redragon M602 owners describe a very bad sensor with frequent spinouts, and Basilisk V3 X owners report documented choppiness. A mouse that mistracks costs you the game, not the spec sheet.
4. Extra buttons you will likely never press
The Basilisk V3 X adds 3 extra buttons and a tilting scroll wheel over the G305's 6, built for MMO raid binds and spreadsheet scrolling. Unless that is genuinely your workflow, that is hardware you paid $19 more for and will never reach.
5. Bigger sensor specs. They won't win you games.
The Basilisk V3 X's 18K sensor and 650 IPS beat the G305's 12,000 DPI and 400 IPS on paper, but no human moves a mouse that fast and most gamers run under 3,200 DPI anyway. What decides matches is consistent tracking and reliable clicks, and that is where the G305's track record wins.
Run your own decision on Pickerooo