Buy the roborock Q10 S5+.
It out-cleans the cheap option and undercuts the expensive one without giving anything up.
What was compared
- roborock Q10 S5+ Robot Vacuum and Mop, 10,000Pa Suction | Upgraded from Q8 max+, 70-Day Se... — $239.99
- Tikom Robot Vacuum and Mop Combo, 5000Pa Robotic Vacuum Cleaner, 150 Min Max, App & Remote... — $109.99
- Shark AV2501S AI Ultra Robot Vacuum, with Matrix Clean, Home Mapping, 30-Day Capacity HEPA... — $414.99
Five reasons
1. 70-day self-empty crushes the Shark's 30
Roborock's 2.7L dust bag runs 70 days before you touch it. The Shark AV2501S needs emptying every 30 days, meaning you're back to bag duty more than twice as often for no real gain.
2. Double the suction of the Tikom
10,000Pa rated suction versus Tikom's 5000Pa isn't a spec-sheet flex, it's the difference between actually pulling dirt out of carpet fibers and just skating over the surface. Pet hair and embedded dust are where Tikom falls apart.
3. It actually mops. Shark AV2501S doesn't.
Roborock's sonic mopping with auto mop lift handles hard floors and carpet transitions in one pass. The Shark AV2501S is vacuum-only, so if you want one robot for both jobs, Shark isn't even in this fight.
4. Tikom owners report units dying within months
Multiple reviewers describe Tikom batteries failing or units working '10-25% of the time' after the first month. Roborock's much larger review base holds up noticeably better over time.
5. Yes, Tikom is cheaper. It won't last.
Tikom's $109.99 looks tempting next to Roborock's $239.99, but repeated reports of dead batteries and stuck units mean you're likely replacing it within a year. Paying more once beats paying twice.
Run your own decision on Pickerooo